Post by account_disabled on Feb 12, 2024 6:34:41 GMT -4
Will webmasters increase ad spend? I admit, I had my hopes up about this. Honestly, who wouldn't want to show that Google only punishes webmasters because it helps their bottom line? Wouldn't it be great if the Search Quality team were found to have been dishonest about our fiduciary independence? Well, unfortunately it's not confirmed. The evidence is quite clear, and there is no reason to believe that webmasters will increase ad spending following the Penguin penalty. Let's look at the numbers. Increased ad traffic From this we can safely conclude that there does not appear to be a direct causal relationship between Penguin's penalties and increased spending.
Now, one can certainly make results may increase future ad revenue as Google attracts Botswana Email List more users to its better search engine, but accusations of a fiduciary motive for releasing an update like this cannot be made Confirm with this data. Have they recovered? By month 1, approximately the number of penalized website traffic was at or above Penguin's previous traffic. This is an exciting result because it does show that penguin recovery is possible. Perhaps most importantly, in the five months following the Penguin incident, sites that were penalized and had their links removed recovered more traffic on average than sites that did not remove their links.
We have good evidence that there is at least a correlation between post-penalty link removal and traffic recovery. Of course, we do have to take this with a grain of salt for a number of reasons: Sites that remove links may also be more likely to use disavow tools. Sites that remove links are likely to be more savvy overall and have site issues fixed. Sites that fail to remove links may be subject to tougher penalties, so not removing links is a conscious decision related to the futility of the removal campaign.
Now, one can certainly make results may increase future ad revenue as Google attracts Botswana Email List more users to its better search engine, but accusations of a fiduciary motive for releasing an update like this cannot be made Confirm with this data. Have they recovered? By month 1, approximately the number of penalized website traffic was at or above Penguin's previous traffic. This is an exciting result because it does show that penguin recovery is possible. Perhaps most importantly, in the five months following the Penguin incident, sites that were penalized and had their links removed recovered more traffic on average than sites that did not remove their links.
We have good evidence that there is at least a correlation between post-penalty link removal and traffic recovery. Of course, we do have to take this with a grain of salt for a number of reasons: Sites that remove links may also be more likely to use disavow tools. Sites that remove links are likely to be more savvy overall and have site issues fixed. Sites that fail to remove links may be subject to tougher penalties, so not removing links is a conscious decision related to the futility of the removal campaign.